Olympic Size Politics... - Instablogs
Olympic Size Politics...
Charles , New York: Apr 8 2008
Made Popular Apr 8 2008
United States :

Olympic Size Politics...
The greatest part of the Olympics is that it brings the world together, which was a goal of the modern day Olympics brain trust. Of course, it’s hard to keep politics from coming to the party and infusing it with all that it is not supposed to be about. This year with China hosting the event everybody had to know that politics was going to jump right in and take center stage. And now with Olympic Torch is being toted around the world and everyone and their brother siding with the Tibetans and their cause and both Athens and London feeling the heat of carrying the torch so far, the question is raised, isn’t it time for the Olympics to have a home instead of this traveling road show that does nothing more than envelope the “bring the world together” message with let’s protest against anything the host country is guilty of for the sake of our outsiders views? It’s interesting that the Winter Olympics don’t have the level of worldly judgments that the summer Olympics do, maybe it’s too cold to have divergent thoughts. It’s pretty obvious that a permanent home would be the perfect solution for this worldwide malady of Olympic Politics and what is stopping that from happening? Politics!

The politics of a lot of people making a lot of money on the backside of every Olympic Committees decision of where the next Games will be playing to the Political Quagmire Actions of the host country that can be exposed, protested against, boycotted or just bitch-slapped.

The Olympics should only be held in perfect states with no religious, political, gender or pollution problems. I think that exists on Pluto now that it is not a planet anymore. Reasonably, the summer Olympics should be held in Athens, the birthplace of the Olympics, and the Winter Olympics should be held in Switzerland the most neutral country in the world and home of the greatest wintertime arena, the Alps. But it’s not going to happen because too much money won’t be made by the wrong type of people. So living with the politics of the Olympics is our bane. Of course, if the Olympics were set in Politics-Free-Zone then we would all become nostalgic for all the politics and protests that were in the past. The wonderful backfiring of the Berlin Games in 1936 where Hitler trying to trumpet his Aryan perfection was embarrassed by Jesse Owens, the far from Aryan and the opposite of all that is Nazi perfection, who won four gold medals. Then again back in Germany the tragedy and the eye-opening world of Middle East terrorism at the Munich games that was a horrible tragedy of mind-boggling proportions. Then there was the tit for tat Olympics held in Moscow and Los Angeles with the USSR and the USA proving how grown up they were. There was the bomb in Atlanta and of course the Iraq soccer team in the Athens’s Olympics that President Bush said was his favorite Olympic moment. He had invaded that country and felt vilified that they could still make a soccer team and make it to the semi-finals.

This year Nancy Pelosi wants Bush not to attend the opening ceremonies as a protest against the Tibetan violence. In reality I think she wants to spare America from the embarrassment of the world seeing him there. I mean if we are going to protest China’s human rights abuses in Tibet how should the rest of the world protest our invasion and occupation of Iraq for the last five years. But beyond all these things my favorite protest of all the Olympics came from two African-American athletes in Mexico City that raised their black gloves in protest of racism in their own country. Maybe, just maybe, there are a couple of Chinese athletes who can express themselves in a similar way because athletes hold a lot more sway and have a lot more power when seen standing up and protesting real atrocities in their own lands on the world stage than politicians ever will…

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Khor
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
The Communist Party in China invest much effort to remove politics from daily life of common people in China. The Chinese government is on another mission now, it wants to remove politics from the mega sports event Olympics also. So, China is repeatedly saying that political protesters agitating against Beijing Olympics are not respecting the spirit and charter of the sports.
1 Stars
Jacob
Mexico City, Mexico
Politics really cannot be separated from sports and China knows it better. The voice against China is going to become stronger and stronger as the Olympics approach. History says all the Olympic Games are highly politically influenced. so, the history is repeating itself this time again. And the matter has been changed - Tibet, Darfur and global warming.
1 Stars
Eko
Jakarta, Indonesia
China is looking determined to make the event highly successful to show its power to rest of the world. The Communist Party and Chinese public is ecstatic about holding the Olympiad. China would definitely highlight its booming economic power and emergence as a new power in world.
1 Stars
Arefa
Kottayam, India
The concept that the sports shouldn't be linked with politics is a nice idea but not possible in practice. Sports bring different peoples who live under different political systems on a single platform. And here comes the politics with the people. Humanity is above politics and sports, so there should be politics in Beijing Olympics too.
1 Stars
Jose
Los Angeles, United States
Hosting major sports events like Olympics are like PR exercise of that country show its own rising economic power to the world. China is doing the same but not facing hurdles now. Almost each of the Olympics in past 100 years have been PR exercises to attract huge global investment. Olympics 2008 is something different from others in past because things are taking dangerous turn against China and there is no indication of things calming down in favor of sports.
1 Stars
Ali
Tehran, Iran
Beijing Olympic 2008 is going to be the worst sports event in the history and China would definitely teach Tibetans a lesson after Olympics. It would divide the world in two block of thoughts. Several other countries regard Tibet crisis as a freedom issue, and China's support for the military regime in Myanmar is adding fuel to the fire. Tibetans should stop the protests and co-operate China in hosting the sports events.
1 Stars
Wai
Yangon, Myanmar
Nothing would happen and no country would give open support to Tibetans because ignoring China's voice in global matter is impossible for almost every country including the United states. The Games would go ahead despite the obstacles and it would be the most spectacular event ever organized in history.
1 Stars
Pyi
Yangon, Myanmar
Talking about separation of games from politics and politics from games is simply a waste of time. Politics has always influenced Olympics in past and so it is happening now again. The Nazis propaganda in Berlin (1936) to the exclusion of Zimbabwe from the Munich (1972). Some Palestinian terrorists had kidnapped and arrested nine Israeli athletes in Munich. China is capable to handle the pressure without using power against protesters.
1 Stars
Toby
Manchester, United Kingdom
You can call it a concept, theory and a paper work only but I still believe in repeating it again and again sports works as a liaison among countries and contribute to their evolution. With the sociological, psychological and physiological aspects of the human nature, sports have also gained the praise of people from all over the world. It brings them together and generates team-spirit despite diversities.
1 Stars
Andrea
Rome, Italy
I agree that Nancy Pelosi wants Bush not to attend the opening ceremonies because she wants to save America from the embarrassment of the world seeing him there because it would then seem America to be a country as China for its raq invasion come whatsoever that cause might have been. Besides, the kind of propaganda the Chinese will get by getting Bush in the Olympic opening ceremonies will be nothing short of a global victory.
1 Stars
Julien
Paris, France
The Olympics has always been used as a political tool. As far as I can remember, the first games not to be boycotted in decades was the Seoul Olympics but then North Korea (understandably), Ethiopia, Nicaragua and Cuba didn't participate. But the world hardly noticed. If there is a single boycott of the games over Chinese occupation of Tibet or China's arms supply to Sudan that is carrying out the genocide in Darfur, it would be widely noticed and more than academic in notion.

For those who do not know, China itself has boycotted the Games after the IOC recognized Taiwan. The Taiwanese team carried the 'China' banner in 1956. China only returned to Olympic competition in the 1980 Winter Games.
1 Stars
Alan
Denver, United States
If we invaded Iraq, we didn't invade it for occupying it permanently. We didn't occupy it for oil as many would tend to believe. We went there to remove a dictator and any weapons of mass destruction present there that threatened the peace of the otherwise highly volatile region. Of course we agree that we had vested business and strategic interest in going to war with Iraq. Things might not have worked out according to plan for George Bush, but there is indeed a democratic government in power in Iraq now and all the people of Iraq are fairly represented by their communities along ethnic and religious lines.

China on the other had annexed Tibet that had been historically a free nation and systematically tortured, murdered and displaced indigenous Tibetans. It has destroyed Tibetan culture and reduced the local Tibetans to a minority by allowing Chinese from other parts of the country to settle there and do business. China is a dictatorial communist government that has no respect for human life, rights or culture. The authoritarian Chinese fail to understand that the free world has a right to express dissent and oppose things overtly. It hardly comes as any surprise that China is bullying countries traditionally sympathetic to the Tibetan cause like India.

China has gone back on its own words on the agreements that it reached with the Dalai Lama and his Tibetan Government in Exile. It extracted an acceptance from the Dalai Lama that it is willing to consider Tibet to be a part of China in exchange for a full autonomy where the Tibetan government headed by the Dalai Lama will have a say in all Tibetan affairs except foreign policy and defense. But it never honored the Chinese part of the concessions.


Therefore, China has no locus standi before the world to argue its case because it has no case at all. It will be devastating to allow China hold the games without any kind of protest from the world commune.
1 Stars
Yash
Gwalior, India
What makes America the mightiest nation on earth to cower before China when it comes to the Tibet issue? Business or fear? China is a communist country with an abysmal human rights record. It rules over a billion and half Chinese through fear and terror where as the United States of America is the biggest champion of democracy that the world has ever known notwithstanding its own record of supporting despots world wide.

George Bush often prides in calling himself as the Commander in Chief of the world's greatest military ever, the President of the world's greatest nation. Where does all this bombast disappear when his legendary diplomatic bluntness (as seen many times on Middle Eastern, European and African issues) becomes the purr of a wet cat? The President doesn't meet the Dalai Lama formally, he just happens to 'drop by'.
1 Stars
Abd
Kuwait City, Kuwait
Either Bush doesn't know what he says or he simply has a very short memory, or it is a combination of both. If Bush said that Iraqi soccer team's participation in the Atlanta Olympics was his favorite Olympics moment then he surely must have said it as a passing remark into which one shouldn't read much. It was well known that the athletes in Iraq who failed to put up a show were tortured, humiliated and often subjected to imprisonment in harsh conditions by the Iraqi Olympic Committee boss Udai, sadistic second son of Saddam. Would Bush have enjoyed if the Iraqi team beat the USA to save themselves from the butcher?
1 Stars
Helen
Manchester, United Kingdom
Such aggressive protests against the Olympics send mixed messages. I feel for the athletes who will never get another chance to compete. The Games bring nations closer. We must understand that there are better ways to protest against China than to use the Olympics as a front.

I sympathise with the Tibetans and support their cause, but I also realise that China is the real problem, not the Olympics. Putting out the torch as we saw in Paris has nothing to with Tibet or other issues like China's human rights record or support to the Sudanese government that is carrying out the atrocities in Darfur etc.
1 Stars
Salil
Kochi, India
See the Olympics are all about politics. It has always been so. The Nazis used it, the Soviets, the West and now the Maoists-turned-Businessmen in Red Suits. Berlin, Munich, Moscow, Los Angeles were all major geopolitical events. Beijing is going to be one as well.

The Olympics are not a major tea-party event where you invite all the nations in the world keeping politics behind just like major political parties in India hold parties once in a while inviting all other parties cutting across political lines.
1 Stars
Alfonso
Kathmandu, Nepal
The Chinese are hoping to use the Games to hide their abysmal human rights record, brutal oppression of their own people and justifying the occupation of Tibet and the genocide and ethnic cleansing it cause there just as Hitler's Nazi Germany tried to use the 1936 Berlin Olympics to hide their racist and militaristic character looking for territorial expansion through use of force. They actually managed to convince many that whatever they heard about Nazi Germany of being intolerant and bellicose is not entirely true and created doubts in the minds of people.

The Chinese are the same. It has occupied Tibet, a country of unarmed peaceful Buddhist monks as it was a soft target. It claims many parts of Asian countries like parts of India as its own. It took back Macao and Hong Kong and now eying on Taiwan. It is a totalitarian regime with voices of opposition silenced through systematic murder, torture and relentless persecution.

The world couldn't act in 1936. Perhaps because information was not as fast and widespread as it is now. We have a chance now to show that the world just cannot be taken for a ride by barbarians in business suits.
1 Stars
Incognito
Boca Raton, United States
Oh that’s priceless... comparing the U.S. to China re. human right’s abuses.
Give me a break!
1 Stars
Sameer Kumar
Hyderabad, India
No country on the planet has a perfect or even good human rights record and while it is important to protest where required, you can’t help but feel why the whole issue has flared up so much only in the last couple of months. Where were all these protesters during the bids and the entire process? Why did they not voice such strong concerns then. The whole thing is nothing beyond gaining political mileage from an international event. Irrespective of the cause, that cannot be denied. Just keep the nonsense away and let the focus be back on the sportsmen.
1 Stars
Desh
Shimla, India
All I can say is that none have any doubt regarding the satisfactory completion of this great sporting event. China is able enough to handle every adverse situation skilfully and adeptly in regards to Olympics. Despite world’s criticism and indirect lectures, China is not going to hear to any of’em. So, doesn’t matter what politicians say, Olympics would take place smoothly.
Add your Comment